Carrick
Carrick v. Peloton Interactive, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GABRIELLE E CARRICK, Case No. 23-cv-04233-SVK
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING
9 v. MOTION TO STAY
10 PELOTON INTERACTIVE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 12 11 Defendant.
12 Plaintiff Gabrielle Carrick commenced this putative class action against Defendant Peloton 13 Interactive, Inc. (“Peloton”), alleging that Peloton violated several provisions of the California 14 Labor Code (the “CLC”) in connection with its employment of Plaintiff and the members of 15 Plaintiff’s putative class. See Dkt. 3, Ex. A (the “Complaint”). It turns out that this is now at least 16 the third lawsuit pending against Peloton alleging substantially the same violations of law 17 stemming from substantially the same conduct. In light of these earlier-filed, overlapping actions, 18 Peloton moves to dismiss or stay this action under the “first-to-file” rule. See Dkt. 12 (the 19 “Motion”). Plaintiff opposes the Motion. See Dkt. 17 (the “Opposition”). Peloton filed a reply. 20 See Dkt. 20. All…