Ma
Ma v. San Francisco Estuary Institute
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8
SHUFEN MA,
9 Case No. 23-cv-05060-JCS Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 11 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DAVID SENN, DISMISS
12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 9 13
14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Plaintiff Shufen Ma, proceeding pro se, brings employment discrimination claims against 17 David Senn and the San Francisco Estuary Institute. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ 18 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Motion”). The Court finds that the Motion is suitable 19 for determination without oral argument and therefore vacates the motion hearing set for January 20 12, 2024 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Motion is 21 GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.1 22 II. BACKGROUND 23 A. Allegations in the Complaint 24 In her Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that she is a “60 year old female immigrant from China” 25 and that Defendants have engaged in “repeated…