Ma
Ma v. San Francisco Estuary Institute
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SHUFEN MA,
Case No. 23-cv-05060-JCS Plaintiff, 10 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
DAVID SENN, DISMISS
12 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 9
14 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Shufen Ma, proceeding pro se, brings employment discrimination claims against David Senn and the San Francisco Estuary Institute. Presently before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint (“Motion”). The Court finds that the Motion is suitable for determination without oral argument and therefore vacates the motion hearing set for January 12, 2024 pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part.1 II. BACKGROUND A. Allegations in the Complaint In her Complaint, Plaintiff alleges that she is a “60 year old female immigrant from China” and that Defendants have engaged in “repeated…