Perez-Pantoja
Clark v. Perez-Pantoja
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9
CLARK CHESTER,
10 Case No. 22-cv-04460 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, 11 ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 12
13 I. PEREZ-PANTOJA,
14 Defendant. (Docket No. 16) 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights complaint under 42 17 U.S.C. § 1983, against Sgt. I. Perez-Pantoja for unconstitutional acts against him at the 18 Correctional Training Facility (“CTF”). Dkt. No. 1. The Honorable Magistrate Judge 19 Kandis A. Westmore found the complaint stated cognizable claims under the First and 20 Eighth Amendments and ordered the matter served on the sole Defendant. Dkt. No. 14. 21 The matter was reassigned to this Court on December 27, 2022. Dkt. No. 10. 22 Defendant Perez-Pantoja filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds that 23 he is entitled to summary judgment on the merits, Plaintiff has failed to exhaust 24 administrative remedies with respect to some of the claims, and he…