Rodrigues

Rodrigues v. General Motors LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20233:23-cv-04488California2,977 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9

10 ANNETTE RODRIGUES and CHARLES

SMITH,

11 No. C 23-04488 WHA Plaintiffs, 12

v.

13 ORDER RE MOTIONS TO GENERAL MOTORS LLC and DOES 1 REMAND AND DISMISS 14 through 10, inclusive, 15 Defendants.

16 17 INTRODUCTION 18 In this automobile “lemon law” and fraud action, plaintiffs move to remand and named 19 defendant moves to dismiss plaintiffs’ fraud claims. For the following reasons, the motion to 20 remand was DENIED at the hearing, and the motion to dismiss is now GRANTED. What’s more, 21 in light of other deficiencies on the face of the complaint, plaintiffs’ remaining claims are 22 dismissed as well. 23 STATEMENT 24 On or about May 23, 2021, plaintiffs Annette Rodrigues and Charles Smith allegedly 25 leased a 2021 Chevrolet Bolt from an authorized dealer and agent of defendant General Motors 26 LLC (Compl. ¶¶ 7, 9; Joint Case Mgmt. Stmt. 1). According to plaintiffs, General Motors 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.