Shwiyat
Shwiyat v. Martin Marietta Materials, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 AUSTIN SHWIYAT, Case No. 3:23-cv-00283-JSC
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: DEFENDANT’S PARTIAL
9 v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
10 MARTIN MARIETTA MATERIALS, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 36 11 Defendant.
12 13 Austin Shwiyat filed suit against Martin Marietta Materials, Inc., alleging various 14 California Labor Code violations pursuant to the California Private Attorney General Act 15 (“PAGA”), California Labor Code §§ 2698–2699. (Dkt. No. 1-1.) Defendant removed this case to 16 federal court, asserting federal question jurisdiction because some of Plaintiff’s claims are 17 completely preempted by federal law. (Dkt. No. 1.) Now pending before the Court is Defendant’s 18 motion for partial summary judgment and motion for leave to file supplemental evidence in 19 support of its partial motion for summary judgment. (Dkt. Nos. 36, 49.) After carefully 20 considering the briefing, and with the benefit of oral argument on December 14, 2023, the Court 21 GRANTS IN…