Torres

Torres v. Botanic Tonics, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20233:23-cv-01460California3,694 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ROMULO TORRES, et al., Case No. 23-cv-01460-VC

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING 7-ELEVEN’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS

BOTANIC TONICS, LLC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 31 Defendants.

This is a case about a drink called Feel Free, which allegedly contains large amounts of a dangerous, addictive ingredient called kratom. The plaintiffs have sued the drink’s manufacturer, along with two retailers who sold Feel Free to them. One of the retailers is 7-Eleven, whose stores sold the drink to plaintiff Romulo Torres. Although the other defendants have filed answers to the complaint, 7-Eleven has filed a motion to dismiss the claim brought by Torres. Torres brings his claim under the “unfair practices” prong of California’s Unfair Competition Law. He asserts that 7-Eleven controlled decisions about which products could be sold in its stores and knew full well that Feel Free was dangerous and addictive. Torres contends that 7-Eleven’s decision to allow this product to be sold in its stores, at least without disclosing to customers how harmful it could be, constitutes an unfair business practice within the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.