Rankins
Rankins v. United Parcel Service, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TAMI RANKINS, Case No. 3:23-cv-05785-JSC
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
9 v. TO REMAND
10 UNITED PARCEL SERVICE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 16 Defendant. 11
12 13 Tami Rankins sued United Parcel Service, Inc. (“UPS”) in California state court, alleging 14 UPS engaged in systemic discrimination, harassment, and wage theft, in violation of California 15 laws. (Dkt. No. 1-1 ¶ 1.)1 UPS then removed this action to federal court, asserting diversity 16 jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1332, and federal question jurisdiction, 28 U.S.C. § 1331. (Dkt. No. 1.) 17 Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to remand. (Dkt. No. 16.) Having carefully 18 considered the briefing and determined oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7- 19 1(b), the Court DENIES Plaintiff's motion. UPS has demonstrated complete diversity between the 20 parties and that the amount in controversy is over $75,000. 21 BACKGROUND 22 …