Keo
Keo v. Marin County
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CHANHT REATREY KEO, Case No. 22-cv-05317-TLT
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
9 v. DISMISS
10 MELISSA ROBBINS COUTTS, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 43, 49 Defendants. 11
12 Before the Court are Defendant San Rafael’s Motion to Dismiss (“San Rafael Mot.”), ECF 13 No. 43, and Defendants Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation’s (“Freddie Mac”) and Melissa 14 Robbins Coutts’ Motion to Dismiss (“Coutts Mot.”), ECF No. 49. For the reasons below, the San 15 Rafael Motion and the Coutts Motion are GRANTED. 16 I. BACKGROUND 17 Plaintiff Chanht Reatrey Keo was the owner of a property in San Rafael, California.1 Am. 18 Compl. ¶¶ 1, 14, ECF No. 41. At some point, the property was sold through non-judicial 19 foreclosure by Freddie Mac. Id. ¶¶ 62–63, 66. Plaintiff subsequently sued Freddie Mac in this 20 Court, arguing that the foreclosure was unlawful. Id. ¶¶ 4(a), 45; Req. Jud. Notice in Support Mot. 21 Dismiss 1st Am. Compl. (“Req. Jud. Notice”), Ex. A (“Dismissal…