Thomas

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HILBERT THOMAS, Case No. 22-cv-01778-JSC

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

SUMMARY JUDGMENT; DENYING

v. MOTION FOR “DECREE”

R. PASHILK, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 63, 78 Defendants.

INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without attorney representation, filed this civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The amended complaint (ECF No. 9) is the operative complaint. The remaining Defendants are three officials at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”): R. Pashilk, R. Feston, and D. Campbell. Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 63), Plaintiff opposed (ECF No. 69), and Defendants replied (ECF No. 73). For the reasons discussed below, the motion for summary judgment is GRANTED, and Plaintiff’s motion for a “decree” (ECF No. 78) is DENIED. BACKGROUND On April 1, 2021, Defendant Pashilk, an officer in SQSP’s…