Mendoza
Mendoza v. Hyundai Motor Company, LTD
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 ELIZABETH MENDOZA, et al., Case No. 15-cv-01685-BLF
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
9 v. DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR
PERMANENT INJUNCTION
10 HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, LTD, et al., [Re: ECF No. 99, 119] 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Hyundai Motor America, Inc.’s motion for a permanent 14 injunction pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a) to enjoin the adjudication of the 15 counterclaims brought by Knight Motors, LP, Doman Auto and Marine Sales, Inc., and 16 Christopher D. Pantelis (collectively “Knight Motors”) in Hyundai Motor America v. Knight 17 Motors, LP, No. GD-19-013607 (Pa. Ct. Com. Pl.). ECF No. 99 (“Mot.”). Knight Motors 18 opposes the motion. ECF No. 105 (“Opp.”). Hyundai filed a reply. ECF No. 109 (“Reply”). The 19 Court held a hearing on December 20, 2023. ECF No. 118. 20 For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART 21 …