Moody v. Andrew M. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 28, 20234:19-cv-03134-DMRCalifornia1,441 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DONNA M., Case No. 19-cv-03134-DMR

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

9 v. ATTORNEYS’ FEES

10 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, Re: Dkt. No. 28 11 Defendant.

12 Plaintiff Donna M. filed a complaint seeking to reverse the Commissioner of the Social 13 Security Administration’s administrative decision finding that she was not entitled to benefits 14 under the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 401 et seq. The court granted Plaintiff’s motion for 15 summary judgment and remanded the case for further proceedings. [Docket No. 22.] Following 16 remand, an Administrative Law Judge (“ALJ”) found that Plaintiff is disabled and entitled to past- 17 due disability benefits. Plaintiff’s counsel Harvey Sackett now moves for an award of attorneys’ 18 fees under 42 U.S.C. § 406(b). [Docket No. 28.] The court ordered Sackett to submit 19 supplemental briefing and evidence in support of the motion, which he timely filed. [Docket Nos. 20 31, 32.] This matter is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.