Burzdak

Burzdak v. Universal Screen Arts, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20243:21-cv-02148California667 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 KAREN BURZDAK, Case No. 21-cv-02148-EMC (EMC)

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’

9 v. MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL OF

CLASS ACTION SETTLEMENT AND

10 UNIVERSAL SCREEN ARTS, INC., MOTION FOR ATTORNEY'S FEES

AND COSTS AND SERVICE AWARD

11 Defendants. 12 Docket Nos. 110, 114

13 14 Before this Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement, 15 Docket No. 114, and Plaintiffs’ Motion for Attorney’s Fees and Costs and Service Award, Docket 16 No. 110. For the reasons set forth below and during the final fairness and motion hearing on 17 December 20, 2023, the Court hereby GRANTS both motions. 18 The Court, in its July 27, 2023, order granting preliminary approval of the class action 19 settlement determined, that in consideration of Ninth Circuit precedent and factors enumerated in 20 Rule 23, that the proposed settlement is fair, reasonable, and adequate. Docket No. 106 at 1-2. 21 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.