Calderon

Calderon v. Covello

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 18, 20233:23-cv-06560California277 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JUAN CARLOS CALDERON, No. 2:23-cv-2847 AC P 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER 14 P. COVELLO, 15 Respondent. 16 17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas 18 corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis. 19 The application attacks a conviction issued by the Santa Clara County Superior Court. 20 Pursuant to 28 U.S.C § 2241(d), courts in both the district of conviction and the district of 21 confinement have concurrent jurisdiction over applications for habeas corpus filed by state 22 prisoners. However, any and all witnesses and evidence necessary for the resolution of 23 petitioner’s application are more readily available in Santa Clara County. See Braden v. 30th 24 Judicial Circuit Court, 410 U.S. 484, 499 n.15 (1973) (district of conviction is generally the more 25 convenient forum for challenges to conviction). Therefore, this action will be transferred to the 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.