Rodriguez

Rodriguez v. Google LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20243:20-cv-04688California5,280 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 ANIBAL RODRIGUEZ, et al., 10 Case No. 20-cv-04688-RS Plaintiffs, 11 v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 12 DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

GOOGLE LLC, SEAL

13 Defendant. 14

15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 In this privacy action, Plaintiffs and Defendant (Google) have filed an omnibus motion to 17 seal various portions of materials related to the parties’ class certification and Daubert briefing. 18 Specifically, the parties request to seal portions of briefing related to Plaintiff’s Motion for Class 19 Certification, expert reports and related appendices, as well as Google’s Daubert Motion and 20 related appendices. For the reasons below, the parties’ omnibus motion to seal is granted in part 21 and denied in part. 22 II. LEGAL STANDARD 23 There is a strong presumption in favor of allowing public access when deciding whether 24 materials should be sealed. See Apple Inc. v. Psystar…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.