Pulyankote
Pulyankote v. General Motors LLC, a Delaware limited liability company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 GOPINATH PULYANKOTE, Case No. 23-cv-04323-SI
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO DISMISS PLAINTIFF'S 10 GENERAL MOTORS LLC, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. No. 37
12 13 14 Defendant has filed a motion to dismiss the fourth and fifth causes of action of plaintiff’s 15 First Amended Complaint (“FAC”). Dkt. No. 37. Plaintiff opposes and requests leave to file a 16 Second Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 39. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines 17 that the motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument, and VACATES the January 5, 2024 18 hearing. For the reasons set forth in the order on motion to dismiss at Dkt. No. 40 of 23-cv-04319- 19 SI, Poonam D. Shah v. General Motors LLC, the Court GRANTS defendant’s motion to dismiss the 20 fraud claims1 without leave to amend and DENIES defendant’s motion to dismiss claims under the 21 “unlawful” and…