Mackey

Mackey v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 21, 20235:22-cv-02391California2,955 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6

TERRY MACKEY,

7 Case No. 5:22-cv-02391 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

DISMISS; TERMINATING OTHER

9 v. MOTION AS MOOT

10

R. BROOMFIELD, et al.,

11

Defendants. 12 (Docket Nos. 20, 21)

13 14 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 15 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison officials and officers at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). 16 The Court found that, liberally construed, Plaintiff’s complaint stated a cognizable claim for 17 the violation of his right to procedural due process in connection with a disciplinary 18 proceeding.1 Dkt. No. 9. Defendants J. Dougery, L. Bravo, D. Tierney, K. Andrade, M. 19 Fitzgibbon, S. Willingham, R. Broomfield, O. Smith, B. Martin, V. Mitchell, and E. Sanders 20 filed a motion to dismiss this action as moot because the disciplinary action was reissued 21 and reheard. Dkt. No. 20 at 3.2 Plaintiff did…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.