Mackey
Mackey v. Broomfield
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6
TERRY MACKEY,
7 Case No. 5:22-cv-02391 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, 8 ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
DISMISS; TERMINATING OTHER
9 v. MOTION AS MOOT
10
R. BROOMFIELD, et al.,
11
Defendants. 12 (Docket Nos. 20, 21)
13 14 Plaintiff, a state prisoner, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 15 U.S.C. § 1983, against prison officials and officers at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”). 16 The Court found that, liberally construed, Plaintiff’s complaint stated a cognizable claim for 17 the violation of his right to procedural due process in connection with a disciplinary 18 proceeding.1 Dkt. No. 9. Defendants J. Dougery, L. Bravo, D. Tierney, K. Andrade, M. 19 Fitzgibbon, S. Willingham, R. Broomfield, O. Smith, B. Martin, V. Mitchell, and E. Sanders 20 filed a motion to dismiss this action as moot because the disciplinary action was reissued 21 and reheard. Dkt. No. 20 at 3.2 Plaintiff did…