Mackey

Mackey v. Bloomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20243:22-cv-05105California260 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 VINCENT ROBERT MACKEY, Case No. 22-cv-05105-JSC 8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

9 Vv. APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL 10 SGT. BAKER, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 50 ll Defendants. 12 Plaintiff moves for appointment of a lawyer to represent him in this civil rights case. 13 There is no right to counsel in a civil case such as this. See Lassiter v. Dep't of Social Services, 14 |] 452 US. 18, 25 (1981). The decision to request counsel to represent an indigent litigant under § 3 15 1915 is within “the sound discretion of the trial court and is granted only in exceptional a 16 circumstances.” Franklin vy. Murphy, 745 F.2d 1221, 1236 (9th Cir. 1984). Plaintiff presents no 3 17 || exceptional circumstances, nor are any apparent. At least at this stage, the issues in this case are S 18 || not sufficiently complex, nor is Plaintiff unable to effectively present his claims, such that the 19 || interests of justice necessitate referral…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.