Ganesh

Ganesh v. United States

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 2, 20245:22-cv-07708California2,749 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Case No. 5:16-cr-00211-1 EJD

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

VACATE CONVICTION UNDER 28

9 v. U.S.C. § 2255

10 VILASINI GANESH, Re: ECF No. 602

11 Defendant.

12 13 Presently before the Court is Defendant Dr. Vilasini Ganesh’s motion to vacate and set 14 aside her conviction under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, arising from an alleged deficient Faretta hearing and 15 ineffective assistance of counsel (“IAC”). ECF No. 602 (“Mot.”). The Government filed its 16 opposition to Dr. Ganesh’s motion on February 28, 2023, ECF No. 609 (“Opp.”), and Dr. Ganesh 17 filed a reply on April 10, 2023. ECF No. 618 (“Reply”). Having considered the parties’ 18 arguments and evidence, the Court DENIES Dr. Ganesh’s § 2255 motion to vacate her conviction. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 On May 19, 2016, Dr. Ganesh was indicted for various counts of health care fraud and 21 money laundering. ECF No. 1. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.