Lamartina
Lamartina v. VMware, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 WILLIAM LAMARTINA, Case No. 20-cv-02182-EJD (VKD)
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE DECEMBER 19, 2023
v. DISCOVERY DISPUTE RE VMWARE'S RULE 30(B)(6) VMWARE, INC., et al., DEPOSITION Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 115
13 The parties ask the Court to resolve a dispute concerning the timing of plaintiff’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition of defendant VMWare, Inc. (“VMWare”). Dkt. Nos. 115, 119. Plaintiff argues that VMWare should be required to produce witnesses to testify on its behalf now. VMWare responds that it should not be required to provide testimony before the parties brief, and the Court resolves, an earlier dispute concerning plaintiff’s contention that VMWare waived privilege and work product protections for certain materials. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). Plaintiff’s Rule 30(b)(6) deposition notice…