Revels

Revels v. Marin County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20244:22-cv-06723California2,808 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TYLER REVELS, Case No. 22-cv-06723-JST

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE;

v. DENYING REQUEST FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

HALE, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 19, 20 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Marin County Jail, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff has also filed a renewed motion for appointment of counsel. ECF No. 19. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek monetary relief from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.