Revels
Revels v. Marin County Jail
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 TYLER REVELS, Case No. 22-cv-06723-JST
8 Plaintiff,
ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE;
9 v. DENYING REQUEST FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
10 HALE, et al., Re: ECF Nos. 19, 20 Defendants. 11
12 13 Plaintiff, an inmate at Marin County Jail, has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 14 § 1983. Now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A is Plaintiff’s second amended 15 complaint. ECF No. 20. Plaintiff has also filed a renewed motion for appointment of counsel. 16 ECF No. 19. 17 DISCUSSION 18 A. Standard of Review 19 A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks 20 redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. 21 § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss any claims 22 that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or seek 23 monetary relief from a…