Betty's Best, Inc. v. The Facebook Advertisers Listed on Schedule A

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20243:23-cv-04716California1,025 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 BETTY’S BEST, INC., Case No. 23-cv-04716-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. TO QUASH

THE FACEBOOK ADVERTISERS Re: Dkt. No. 42 LISTED ON SCHEDULE A, et al., 11 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff Betty’s Best, Inc., filed an ex parte motion to enjoin the infringement of Plaintiff’s intellectual property by 592 Facebook Advertisers. (Dkt. No. 16.) The Court granted Plaintiff leave to subpoena Meta Platforms, Inc. (Meta) for the identifying information of 592 Facebook Advertisers. (Dkt. No. 40.) Before the Court is Certain Defendants’ motion to quash the subpoena. (Dkt. No. 42.) Having carefully considered the briefing, and with the benefit of oral argument on January 4, 2024, the Court DENIES the motion. Certain Defendants fail to demonstrate quashal or modification of Plaintiff’s Rule 45 subpoena is required or permissible because Certain Defendants’ identifying information is neither privileged nor commercial information…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.