U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Crowd Machine, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OAKLAND DIVISION
8 9 U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE Case No.: 4:22-cv-00076-HSG
COMMISSION,
10 Hon. Haywood S. Gilliam, Jr, Plaintiff, 11 ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
v. 12 CONSIDER WHETHER ANOTHER
PARTY’S MATERIAL SHOULD BE
CROWD MACHINE, INC., METAVINE,
13 SEALED INC, and CRAIG DEREL SPROULE, 14 Defendants, 15 16 and 17
METAVINE PTY. LTD.,
18 Relief Defendant, 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 1 ORDER 2 The Court, having considered Plaintiff’s Administrative Motion to Consider 3 Whether Another Party’s Material Should be Sealed (ECF No. 41), as well as 4 Defendants’ Response thereto, and the Declaration of Anne Osborne in support 5 thereof, HEREBY ORDERS THAT: 6 1. The Court finds there are compelling reasons sufficient to overcome 7 the presumption in favor of granting public access to the documents below. “Courts 8 have found that ‘confidential business information’…