Skillz Platform Inc. v. AviaGames Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 20245:21-cv-02436California1,280 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 SKILLZ PLATFORM INC., Case No. 21-cv-02436-BLF

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART

9 v. MOTION TO SEAL IN CONNECTION

WITH MOTION TO STRIKE

10 AVIAGAMES INC., [Re: ECF No. 551] 11 Defendant.

12 13 Before the Court is Plaintiff Skillz Platform Inc.’s administrative motion to consider 14 whether another party’s material should be sealed in connection with its motion to strike the 15 supplemental declaration of Peng Zhang. ECF No. 551. The Court has considered the motion, 16 and its ruling is laid out below. 17 I. LEGAL STANDARD 18 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records 19 and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of 20 Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Commc’ns, Inc., 435 21 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). Consequently, access to motions and their attachments that are 22 “more than…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.