Tyson
Tyson v. ACRT Services Incorporated
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 RYAN TYSON, Case No. 23-cv-01889-HSG
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
DISMISS AND DENYING MOTION
9 v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
10 ACRT SERVICES INCORPORATED, et Re: Dkt. Nos. 28, 44, 67, 70, 75 al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Before the Court are Defendants’ four motions to dismiss and Plaintiff’s motion for 14 summary judgment. See Dkt. Nos. 28, 44, 67, 70, 75. The Court finds these matters appropriate 15 for disposition without oral argument and the matters are deemed submitted. For the reasons 16 detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motions to dismiss, see Dkt. Nos. 28, 67, 70, 75, and 17 DENIES the motion for summary judgment, see Dkt. No. 44. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 Pro se Plaintiff Ryan Tyson worked as an arborist for Defendant ACRT Services, Inc. 20 Amended Complaint (“FAC”) ¶¶ 7–11. Plaintiff alleges that on September 10, 2021, he was 21 involved in an automobile accident and suffered injuries that caused him to be disabled beginning 22 on…