Moreno

Moreno v. Perez-Pantoja

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 5, 20244:22-cv-02267California5,580 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 PAUL ANTHONY MORENO, Case No. 22-cv-02267-JST

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

9 v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

10 I. PEREZ-PANTOJA, JUDGMENT; REFERRING CASE TO

PRO SE PRISONER MEDIATION

11 Defendant. PROGRAM; STAYING ACTION;

DIRECTIONS TO CLERK

12 Re: ECF No. 18 13 14 Plaintiff, an inmate housed at Correctional Training Facility (“CTF), has filed a pro se 15 complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that CTF correctional officer I. Perez-Pantoja: 16 (1) retaliated against him for filing a grievance against non-party CTF correctional officer Bravo 17 by searching his cell and destroying his property during the search, in violation of the First 18 Amendment; and (2) was deliberately indifferent to Plaintiff’s serious needs by failing to follow 19 COVID-19 protocols when searching Plaintiff’s cell, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. ECF 20 Nos. 1, 6. Now pending before the Court is Defendants’ motion for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.