Wescott

Wescott v. Apple Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 8, 20245:23-cv-06254California348 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 CARL A. WESCOTT, Case No. 23-cv-06254-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

v. DISMISSAL FOR FAILURE TO

PROSECUTE AND TO COMPLY

APPLE INC, WITH COURT ORDER Defendant.

13 On December 4, 2023, Carl A. Wescott, who is representing himself, filed a complaint, along with an application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Dkt. Nos. 1, 2. On December 6, 2023, the Court granted Mr. Wescott’s IFP application, but found that his complaint failed to sufficiently identify a basis for the Court’s jurisdiction, and also failed to state a claim for relief. Dkt. No. 4. Accordingly, the Court stayed service of process and gave Mr. Wescott until January 5, 2024 to file an amended complaint. Id. The Court’s December 6, 2023 order stated that “[i]f Mr. Wescott cannot cure the identified deficiencies, the Court will recommend termination and dismissal of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.