Unbeatablesale.com, Inc. v. Meta Platforms, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20243:23-cv-03719California692 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 UNBEATABLESALE.COM, INC., Case No. 3:23-cv-03719-JD

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER RE MOTION TO DISMISS

9 v. AND TO SHOW CAUSE

10 META PLATFORMS INC., Defendant. 11

12 13 Plaintiff UnbeatableSale.com, Inc. (UBS) originally sued defendant Meta Platforms Inc. 14 (Meta) in the District of New Jersey for a single claim of breach of contract in connection with the 15 removal of UBS’s posted content. Dkt. No. 1. In July 2023, the New Jersey court transferred the 16 case to this Court on the basis of a contractual forum selection clause. Dkt. No. 30. 17 Since the arrival of the case here, UBS has done nothing to prosecute this action. UBS’s 18 lawyer in New Jersey did not file an application to appear pro hac vice in this District, and no 19 other lawyer has made an appearance. As a result, there does not appear to be a lawyer 20 representing UBS who is admitted to practice in this District. UBS did not oppose or otherwise 21 respond in any way to a motion to dismiss that Meta filed in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.