Mejia

Mejia v. RXO Last Mile, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 9, 20243:22-cv-08976California2,479 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MAYNOR MEJIA, Case No. 22-cv-08976-SI

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S 9 v. MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A

THIRD-PARTY COMPLAINT

10 RXO LAST MILE, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 49 11 Defendant.

12 13 Before the Court is defendant’s motion for leave to file a third-party complaint for indemnity 14 against ABC Logistics, Inc. Dkt. No. 49. Plaintiff opposes. Dkt. No. 50. Pursuant to Civil Local 15 Rule 7-1(b), the Court determines that the motion is suitable for resolution without oral argument, 16 and VACATES the January 12, 2024 hearing. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS 17 defendant’s motion. 18 19 BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff Maynor Mejia Lopez brings this proposed class action against RXO Last Mile, Inc.1 21 and Does 1 through 25 (“defendants” or “RXO”) alleging RXO denied plaintiff and other “Delivery 22 Drivers”2 the benefits and protections required under the California Labor Code and other state laws3 23 1…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.