Carter

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9

10 PMI WATERFORD PARK, LLC, Case No. 24-cv-00081-NC 11 Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE AS 12 TO WHY THIS CASE SHOULD v. NOT BE REMANDED TO STATE 13 COURT TOMMY CARTER, and others, 14 Re: ECF 1 Defendants. 15 16 17 Before the Court is Defendants Tommy-Lee Carter and Lisa-Lorraine Willis’ 18 Notice of Removal (“Notice”). ECF 1. However, the underlying state court case appears 19 to be an unlawful detainer action. See id., Exhibit. Because such a claim does not appear 20 to confer federal jurisdiction, the Court ORDERS Defendants to address, in writing, why 21 this case should remain in federal court. 22 I. LEGAL STANDARD 23 “[A]ny civil action brought in a State court of which the district courts of the United 24 States have original jurisdiction, may be removed by the defendant” to the district court 25 where the action is pending. 28 U.S.C. § 1441. The removal…