Strifling

Strifling v. Twitter Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 4, 20244:22-cv-07739California1,799 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 CAROLINA BERNAL STRIFLING, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07739-JST

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. STRIKE

TWITTER INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 46 Defendants.

12 Before the Court is Defendant Twitter, Inc.’s (“Twitter”) motion to strike. ECF No. 46. The Court will grant the motion. Plaintiffs Carolina Bernal Strifling and Willow Wren Turkal filed this lawsuit against Twitter on December 7, 2022, bringing claims for sex-based discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act (“FEHA”). See ECF No. 38 at 2. The Court granted Twitter’s motion to dismiss the original complaint, concluding, inter alia, that Strifling and Turkal lacked standing to challenge a policy implemented by Twitter following a Reduction-in-Force (“Post-RIF Policy”) because they were no longer employees of Twitter when the Policy was implemented. See id. at 7 n.5. The Court gave…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.