Strifling
Strifling v. Twitter Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 CAROLINA BERNAL STRIFLING, et al., Case No. 22-cv-07739-JST
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO
9 v. STRIKE
10 TWITTER INC., et al., Re: ECF No. 46 Defendants. 11
12 13 Before the Court is Defendant Twitter, Inc.’s (“Twitter”) motion to strike. ECF No. 46. 14 The Court will grant the motion. 15 Plaintiffs Carolina Bernal Strifling and Willow Wren Turkal filed this lawsuit against 16 Twitter on December 7, 2022, bringing claims for sex-based discrimination under Title VII of the 17 Civil Rights Act of 1964 (“Title VII”) and California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act 18 (“FEHA”). See ECF No. 38 at 2. The Court granted Twitter’s motion to dismiss the original 19 complaint, concluding, inter alia, that Strifling and Turkal lacked standing to challenge a policy 20 implemented by Twitter following a Reduction-in-Force (“Post-RIF Policy”) because they were 21 no longer employees of Twitter when the Policy was implemented. See id. at 7 n.5. The Court 22 gave…