Apple Inc. v. Alivecor, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 29, 20234:22-cv-07608California2,028 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 APPLE INC., Case No. 22-cv-07608-HSG

8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

STAY

9 v. Re: Dkt. No. 62 10 ALIVECOR, INC., 11 Defendant.

12 13 On October 23, 2023, Defendant AliveCor, Inc. (“Defendant” or “AliveCor”) filed a 14 motion to stay the case pending completion of inter partes review (“IPR”) proceedings. Dkt. No. 15 62 (“Mot.”). The Court, in its discretion, finds this matter suitable for resolution without oral 16 argument. See Civ. L.R. 7–1(b). For the reasons articulated below, the Court GRANTS 17 AliveCor’s motion and stays this action pending the institution decisions regarding its IPR 18 petitions. 19 I. BACKGROUND 20 Plaintiff Apple, Inc. (“Apple”) filed this action for patent infringement on December 12, 21 2022. Dkt. No. 1. In the Complaint, Apple alleges direct and indirect infringement of four 22 patents, all related to electrocardiogram (“EKG”) technology and related applications: U.S. Patent 23 Nos. 10,076,257 (“the ’257 Patent”);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.