Wickham

Wickham v. Schenker, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20245:23-cv-00946California3,136 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ERIC WICKHAM, Case No. 23-cv-00946-PCP

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. TRANSFER

SCHENKER, INC., Defendant.

12 In this nationwide class action, plaintiff Eric M. Wickham alleges that the defendant Schenker, Inc. violated the Fair Credit Reporting Act and California law by failing to provide proper disclosures and obtain proper authorization prior to conducting credit and background checks on prospective employees. Before the Court is Schenker’s motion to transfer this matter to the Eastern District of Virginia under 28 U.S.C. § 1404(a). For the following reasons, the Court concludes that Schenker has failed to demonstrate that the convenience of parties and witnesses and the interest of justice favor transfer. The Court therefore denies Schenker’s motion. BACKGROUND Mr. Wickham is a resident of San Bernadino County, California. He seeks to represent a class of current, former, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.