Pineda
Pineda v. Kijakazi
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 A.P., Case No. 23-cv-01184-EMC
8 Plaintiff,
9 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S
MOTION FOR SUMMARY
10 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, et al., JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR 11 Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
12 Docket Nos. 9, 13 13
14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Pl’s Mot.”), 15 Docket No. 9, and Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (“D’s Mot.”), Docket No. 16 13. Claimant A.P. seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s final 17 decision denying her applications for both disability insurance benefits and supplemental security 18 income. See generally Pl’s Mot. A.P. has exhausted her administrative remedies with respect to 19 her claim of disability; this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A.P. seeks an 20 order reversing the agency decision and remanding for payment of benefits, or alternatively, 21 remanding for further administrative proceedings. …