Pineda

Pineda v. Kijakazi

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 10, 20243:23-cv-01184California9,141 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 A.P., Case No. 23-cv-01184-EMC

8 Plaintiff,

9 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S

MOTION FOR SUMMARY

10 KILOLO KIJAKAZI, et al., JUDGMENT AND DENYING DEFENDANTS' MOTION FOR 11 Defendants. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

12 Docket Nos. 9, 13 13

14 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment (“Pl’s Mot.”), 15 Docket No. 9, and Defendants’ Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment (“D’s Mot.”), Docket No. 16 13. Claimant A.P. seeks review of the Commissioner of Social Security Administration’s final 17 decision denying her applications for both disability insurance benefits and supplemental security 18 income. See generally Pl’s Mot. A.P. has exhausted her administrative remedies with respect to 19 her claim of disability; this Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). A.P. seeks an 20 order reversing the agency decision and remanding for payment of benefits, or alternatively, 21 remanding for further administrative proceedings. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.