Eric Alan Sanders v. Chime Stride Bank, N.A.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
ERIC ALAN SANDERS,
Case No. 21-cv-06068-RS Plaintiff, 11 v. ORDER DENYING RULE 60(b) MOTION
CHIME STRIDE BANK, N.A.,
13 Defendant.
Plaintiff Eric Alan Sanders filed a motion for relief under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 60(b)(6) seeking to set aside the dismissal of his case for failure to prosecute and comply with court deadlines. See Order, Dkt. 19 (Oct. 19, 2021). Sanders argues extraordinary circumstances justify reopening his case. For the reasons below, Sanders’ motion is denied. DISCUSSION As a preliminary matter, it appears a separate document setting out the judgment should have been, but was not, entered in this case after the dismissal order was issued on October 19, 2021. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 58(c) specifies that where a separate document setting out a judgment is required, judgment is entered at the earlier of the following events: “(A) it is set…