Boston Retirement System v. Uber Technologies, Inc.

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BOSTON RETIREMENT SYSTEM, Case No. 19-cv-06361-RS (DMR) Individually and on behalf of all others 8 similarly situated,

ORDER RE: NOVEMBER 9, 2023

9 Plaintiff, JOINT DISCOVERY LETTER 10 v. Re: Dkt. No. 394

11 UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC., et al.,

12 Defendants.

13 The court has reviewed the parties’ joint discovery letter (“JDL”) in which Lead Plaintiff 14 Boston Retirement System moves to compel production of 12 documents listed on Defendant 15 Uber Technologies, Inc. (“Uber”)’s privilege log. [Docket No. 394.] In the alternative, Lead 16 Plaintiff asks the court to perform an in camera inspection of the documents. Uber contends that 17 the documents or their redactions are protected by the attorney-client privilege. Lead Plaintiff 18 disputes the application of the attorney-client privilege, asserting that the documents relate to 19 business advice, convey factual information, or contain blanket redactions. The parties agree that 20 federal privilege…