Suarez

Suarez v. Bank of America N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 11, 20243:18-cv-01202-LBCalifornia2,777 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 ARIANNA SUAREZ, Case No. 18-cv-01202-LB

12 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING FINAL

13 v. APPROVAL

14 BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL

ASSOCIATION,

15 Defendant. 16

IRMA FRAUSTO,

Case No. 18-cv-01983-LB 17 Plaintiff,

18 v. ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL

19 BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL Re: ECF Nos. 208 and 210

ASSOCIATION,

20

Defendant. 21

22 INTRODUCTION 23 In these putative class actions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the plaintiffs — 24 current and former nonexempt California employees at Bank of America — challenge Bank of 25 America’s alleged failure to pay them for their off-the-clock work, provide meal and rest breaks, 26 27 1 or reimburse expenses. The plaintiffs claim violations of the California Labor Code, California’s 2 Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and California’s Private Attorney’s General Act (PAGA).1 3 The parties settled…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.