Suarez
Suarez v. Bank of America N.A.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 San Francisco Division 11 ARIANNA SUAREZ, Case No. 18-cv-01202-LB
12 Plaintiff,
ORDER GRANTING FINAL
13 v. APPROVAL
14 BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL
ASSOCIATION,
15 Defendant. 16
IRMA FRAUSTO,
Case No. 18-cv-01983-LB 17 Plaintiff,
18 v. ORDER GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL
19 BANK OF AMERICA, NATIONAL Re: ECF Nos. 208 and 210
ASSOCIATION,
20
Defendant. 21
22 INTRODUCTION 23 In these putative class actions under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 23, the plaintiffs — 24 current and former nonexempt California employees at Bank of America — challenge Bank of 25 America’s alleged failure to pay them for their off-the-clock work, provide meal and rest breaks, 26 27 1 or reimburse expenses. The plaintiffs claim violations of the California Labor Code, California’s 2 Unfair Competition Law (UCL), and California’s Private Attorney’s General Act (PAGA).1 3 The parties settled…