Rutter

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WILLIAM RUTTER, et al., Case No. 21-cv-04077-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

MOTION TO DISMISS

v. Re: Dkt. No. 58 APPLE INC., Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant Apple Inc.’s Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs’ Third Amended Complaint. Dkt. No. 58. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons discussed below, the Court GRANTS the motion. I. BACKGROUND The Court dismissed Plaintiffs’ first amended complaint (“FAC”) on May 6, 2022. Dkt. No. 37 (“MTD FAC Order”). Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint (“SAC”) on May 27, 2022, Dkt. No. 38, which the Court dismissed on May 5, 2023. Dkt. No. 51 (“MTD SAC Order”). Plaintiffs filed a third amended complaint (“TAC”) on May 25, 2023, bringing claims under the California Consumers Legal Remedies Act (“CLRA”) and Unfair Competition Law (“UCL”), and …