Lowe
Lowe v. Edgewell Personal Care Company
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 BRIGETTE LOWE, Case No. 23-cv-00834-AMO
8 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO
DISMISS, DENYING AS MOOT
9 v. REQUESTS FOR JUDICIAL NOTICE;
DENYING AS MOOT MOTION FOR
10 EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE LEAVE TO RESPOND TO NOTICE OF
COMPANY, SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY
11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 38, 55 12
13 SARAHA MACK, et al., Related Case No. 23-cv-00837-AMO 14 Plaintiffs, 15 v.
16 EDGEWELL PERSONAL CARE Re: Dkt. Nos. 38, 39, 56
COMPANY,
17 Defendant. 18
19 20 These related putative class actions against Edgewell Personal Care Company concern two 21 different tampon product lines: o.b. Organic™ tampons and Playtex Gentle Glide tampons. Lowe 22 Am. Compl. (ECF 34) ¶ 1 n.1; Mack Am. Compl. (ECF 32) ¶ 1. The gravamen of each complaint 23 is that the tampons contain harmful “per and polyfluoroalkyl substances (‘PFAS’),” otherwise 24 known as “forever chemicals,” rendering…