Harbour

Harbour v. California Health & Wellness Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20245:21-cv-03322California5,548 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

24 This is a data privacy litigation brought by Representative Plaintiffs John Harbour, Tami 25 Wisnesky, Joweli Vunisa, and J. Doe (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Class Representatives”) against 26 Defendants California Health & Wellness Plan, Health Net of California, Inc., Health Net Life 27 Insurance Company, Health Net Community Solutions, Inc., Health Net, LLC, and Centene 1 Corporation (collectively “Health Net Defendants”), and Accellion, Inc., (“Accellion”) (all 2 collectively “Defendants”) following Health Net’s confirmation that it was impacted by the FTA 3 Data Breach. The Settlement Agreement seeks to dismiss the action only as to the Health Net 4 Defendants. Order Granting Prelim. Approval of Class Action Settlement 1, ECF No. 56. 5 In its Preliminary Approval Order, the Court conditionally certified the Settlement Class 6 and provisionally appointed Tina Wolfson, Robert Ahdoot, and Andrew Ferich of Ahdoot & 7 Wolfson, PC, Laurence D. King, Matthew B. George, and Joel B. Strauss of Kaplan Fox & 8 Kilsheimer LLP, and Timothy G. Blood, Paula R Brown, and Jennifer L MacPherson of Blood 9 Hurst & O’Reardon, LLP (collectively…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.