Harbour

Harbour v. California Health & Wellness Plan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20245:21-cv-03322California5,548 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

24 This is a data privacy litigation brought by Representative Plaintiffs John Harbour, Tami 25 Wisnesky, Joweli Vunisa, and J. Doe (collectively “Plaintiffs” or “Class Representatives”) against 26 Defendants California Health & Wellness Plan, Health Net of California, Inc., Health Net Life 27 Insurance Company, Health Net Community Solutions, Inc., Health Net, LLC, and Centene Corporation (collectively “Health Net Defendants”), and Accellion, Inc., (“Accellion”) (all collectively “Defendants”) following Health Net’s confirmation that it was impacted by the FTA Data Breach. The Settlement Agreement seeks to dismiss the action only as to the Health Net Defendants. Order Granting Prelim. Approval of Class Action Settlement 1, ECF No. 56. In its Preliminary Approval Order, the Court conditionally certified the Settlement Class and provisionally appointed Tina Wolfson, Robert Ahdoot, and Andrew Ferich of Ahdoot & Wolfson, PC, Laurence D. King, Matthew B. George, and Joel B. Strauss of Kaplan Fox & Kilsheimer LLP, and Timothy G. Blood, Paula R Brown, and Jennifer L MacPherson of Blood Hurst & O’Reardon, LLP (collectively…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.