Roblox Corporation v. WowWee Group Limited

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 16, 20243:22-cv-04476California2,186 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 6 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 8 ROBLOX CORPORATION, Case No. 22-cv-04476-SI

9 Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING IN CAMERA

10 v. REVIEW OF DISCOVERY

DOCUMENTS FOR WHICH ROBLOX

11 WOWWEE GROUP LIMITED, et al., ASSERTS ATTORNEY-CLIENT

PRIVILEGE

12 Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 160, 166, 167 13

14 15 16 I. Documents Submitted by Roblox for In Camera Review Pursuant to Court Order at 17 Dkt. No. 156 18 A. Background 19 Before the Court are two discovery documents submitted by plaintiff Roblox for in camera 20 review to determine whether the documents are privileged, as directed by the Court on December 21 8, 2023. See Dkt. No. 156. The documents are identified as ROBLOX-PLOG-001 and ROBLOX- 22 PLOG-0002 on Roblox’s privilege log. See Dkt. No. 160. 23 The dispute involving these documents concerns a July 11, 2022 meeting between Roblox 24 and Gamefam where Roblox allegedly “improperly (and successfully) pressured Gamefam to 25 terminate its collaboration with WowWee.” Dkt. No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.