Hudson

Hudson v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20245:21-cv-06747California3,511 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10

TORIANO G. HUDSON, SR.,

11 Case No. 21-cv-06747 EJD (PR) Plaintiff, 12 ORDER GRANTING v. DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR 13 SUMMARY JUDGMENT;

ADDRESSING PENDING MOTIONS

14 RON BROOMFIELD, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16 (Docket Nos. 30, 35, 36)

17 18 Plaintiff, a California state prisoner, filed a pro se civil rights complaint pursuant to 19 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Court issued an order of partial dismissal and of service. Dkt. No. 20 7. Defendants filed a motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1) 21 based on the lack of subject-matter jurisdiction. Dkt. No. 11. The Court denied the motion 22 and directed Defendants to file a summary judgment motion on Plaintiff’s due process 23 claim challenging the denial of parole under California’s Proposition 57.1 Dkt. No. 24. 24 Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment on the grounds…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.