Rangel

Rangel v. Williams

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20243:21-cv-00278California580 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 JONATHAN RANGEL, Case No. 21-cv-00278-JSC

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER TO UPDATE ADDRESS AND

9 v. TO SHOW CAUSE WHY CASE

SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

10 V. WILLIAMS, et al., Defendants. 11

12 Plaintiff, a California prisoner proceeding without an attorney, filed this civil rights action 13 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On October 17, 2023, the most recent order was mailed to him with the 14 prisoner number and address he provided to the Court on July 5, 2023.1 (ECF Nos. 81, 82, 83.) 15 On October 26, 2023, the order was returned by the postal service because the mail could not be 16 delivered to him at the address and with the number he provided. (ECF No. 84.) Plaintiff has not 17 filed an opposition to Defendants’ motion for summary judgment despite having requested, and 18 received, an extension of time to do so (ECF No. 83); nor has he made contact with the Court in 19 more than six months. 20 Pursuant to Northern District Civil Local Rule 3-11, a party proceeding without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.