Mendoza

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 ELIZABETH MENDOZA, et al., Case No. 15-cv-01685-BLF

8 Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

9 v. CLARIFY

10 HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, LTD, et [Re: ECF No. 122] al., 11 Defendants. 12 13 Knight Motors, LP, Doman Auto & Marine Sales, Inc., and Christopher D. Pantelis 14 (collectively “Knight Motors”) submitted a motion to clarify the Court’s order granting in part and 15 denying in part Defendant Hyundai Motor America, Inc.’s motion for a permanent injunction 16 under the All Writs Act. ECF No. 122. Hyundai opposes the motion. ECF No. 123. 17 For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 The facts of this case are more thoroughly laid out in the Court’s order granting in part and 20 denying in part Hyundai’s motion for a permanent injunction under the All Writs Act. See ECF 21 No. 121 at 1–4. Accordingly, the Court will provide only an abbreviated summary here. 22 In August 2019, Hyundai…