Mendoza

Mendoza v. Hyundai Motor Company, LTD

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 17, 20245:15-cv-01685California1,654 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 ELIZABETH MENDOZA, et al., Case No. 15-cv-01685-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

v. CLARIFY

HYUNDAI MOTOR COMPANY, LTD, et [Re: ECF No. 122] al., 11 Defendants. 12 Knight Motors, LP, Doman Auto & Marine Sales, Inc., and Christopher D. Pantelis (collectively “Knight Motors”) submitted a motion to clarify the Court’s order granting in part and denying in part Defendant Hyundai Motor America, Inc.’s motion for a permanent injunction under the All Writs Act. ECF No. 122. Hyundai opposes the motion. ECF No. 123. For the reasons stated below, the Court DENIES the motion. I. BACKGROUND The facts of this case are more thoroughly laid out in the Court’s order granting in part and denying in part Hyundai’s motion for a permanent injunction under the All Writs Act. See ECF No. 121 at 1–4. Accordingly, the Court will provide only an abbreviated summary here. In August 2019, Hyundai…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.