Gonzalez
Gonzalez v. Ahern
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 DANIEL GONZALEZ, et al., Case No. 3:19-cv-07423-JSC
8 Plaintiffs,
ORDER RE: DISCOVERY LETTER
9 v. BRIEFS RE: DEPOSITIONS
10 COUNTY OF ALAMEDA, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 386, 387, 388, 389 Defendants. 11
12 The parties submitted four joint discovery letter briefs regarding Plaintiffs’ requests for 13 additional depositions. (Dkt. Nos. 386, 387, 388, 389.) Oral argument is not necessary to resolve 14 these disputes. See N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). 15
RELEVANT PROCEDURAL HISTORY
16 Plaintiffs filed this action in November 2019. They filed an amended complaint as of right in 17 May 2020, as no defendant had been served in the interim. (Dkt. No. 10.) After significant motion 18 practice, including several motions to dismiss and a motion for a preliminary injunction, the Court 19 entered a pretrial schedule. (Dkt. No. 128.) The schedule, which the parties had proposed, had a fact 20 discovery deadline of May 1, 2022. (Id.) The Pretrial Order directed that all depositions must be 21 noticed at…