Clements

Clements v. T-Mobile USA, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20245:22-cv-07512California4,037 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 8 BRADFORD ARTHUR CLEMENTS, Case No. 5:22-cv-07512-EJD

9 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION AND

10 v. DISMISS

11 T-MOBILE USA, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 37 Defendants. 12

13 Plaintiff, Branford Clements (“Clements”), filed this data breach action against Defendant, 14 T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al. (“T-Mobile”), alleging claims arising under various California 15 consumer protection and privacy statutes, common law torts, and the Stored Communications Act 16 (“SCA”). First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 35. Before the Court is T-Mobile’s unopposed 17 motion to compel arbitration and dismiss. Def.’s Mot. to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss 18 (“Mot.”), ECF No. 37. 19 Having carefully reviewed the relevant documents, the Court finds this matter suitable for 20 decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, 21 the Court GRANTS T-Mobile’s motion to compel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.