Clements

Clements v. T-Mobile USA, Inc

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20245:22-cv-07512California4,037 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 BRADFORD ARTHUR CLEMENTS, Case No. 5:22-cv-07512-EJD

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

COMPEL ARBITRATION AND

v. DISMISS

T-MOBILE USA, INC, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 37 Defendants.

Plaintiff, Branford Clements (“Clements”), filed this data breach action against Defendant, T-Mobile USA, Inc., et al. (“T-Mobile”), alleging claims arising under various California consumer protection and privacy statutes, common law torts, and the Stored Communications Act (“SCA”). First Am. Compl. (“FAC”), ECF No. 35. Before the Court is T-Mobile’s unopposed motion to compel arbitration and dismiss. Def.’s Mot. to Compel Arbitration and to Dismiss (“Mot.”), ECF No. 37. Having carefully reviewed the relevant documents, the Court finds this matter suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, the Court GRANTS T-Mobile’s motion to compel…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.