Vanderloo

Vanderloo v. Allstate Northbrook Indemnity Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20245:23-cv-04964California2,314 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 EVAN VANDERLOO, Case No. 23-cv-04964-BLF

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

9 v. REMAND

10 ALLSTATE NORTHBROOK [Re: ECF No. 13]

INDEMNITY COMPANY,

11 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiff Evan Vanderloo filed this suit against Defendant Allstate Northbrook Indemnity 14 Company (“Allstate”) in Santa Clara County Superior Court, asserting state law claims relating to 15 injuries sustained in a car accident. Allstate removed the case to federal district court based on 16 diversity jurisdiction. See ECF No. 1 (“Not. of Removal”) ¶ 1. 17 Mr. Vanderloo moves to remand the case to state court, arguing that the notice of removal 18 was untimely because it was filed more than thirty days after service of the summons and 19 complaint. ECF No. 13 (“Mot.”); ECF No. 17 (“Reply”). Mr. Vanderloo does not dispute the 20 existence of diversity jurisdiction; the motion to remand is based solely on procedural grounds. 21 Id. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.