Messiah

Messiah v. Garcia Lara

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20244:22-cv-02616California864 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 MESSIAH MESSIAH, Case No. 22-cv-02616-JSW

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

LEAVE TO FILE SECOND AMENDED

9 COMPLAINT; DENYING MOTION

FOR EXTENSION OF TIME;

10 v. VACATING BRIEFING SCHEDULE;

GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR

11 D. GARCIA LARA, et al., REPRODUCTION; SETTING

SCHEDULE FOR SECOND AMENDED

12 COMPLAINT AND DISPOSITIVE Defendants. MOTIONS 13 Re: Dkt. Nos. 37, 39, 40 14 15 Plaintiff filed a motion for leave to file a second amended complaint “SAC”. The 16 proposed SAC attached does not coherently list the factual allegations, the causes of action, the 17 defendants, and the relief sought. Consequently, leave to file it is DENIED. If Plaintiff wants to 18 file an SAC, he must, within 28 days of the date this order is filed, file: (1) a new motion for leave 19 to amend and (2) attach a proposed SAC using the Court’s form civil rights complaint. The 20 proposed SAC…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.