Gomez

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 7 MICHELLE GOMEZ, Case No. 23-cv-06307-BLF

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR A

9 v. MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT

10 WILLIAM CHARLES DRESSER, [Re: ECF No. 8] 11 Defendant.

12 Defendant William Charles Dresser filed a motion for a more definite statement pursuant 13 to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(e). See ECF No. 8. Plaintiff Michelle Gomez has not filed 14 an opposition to the motion. See ECF No. 10 (Dresser’s reply noting that no opposition was 15 filed). For the reasons below, the Court GRANTS Defendant’s motion. 16 Rule 12(e) provides that “[a] party may move for a more definite statement of a pleading to 17 which a responsive pleading is allowed but which is so vague or ambiguous that the party cannot 18 reasonably prepare a response.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(e). “Although generally viewed with disfavor, 19 the proper test in evaluating a Rule 12(e) motion is whether the complaint provides the…