Brown

Brown v. City National Bank

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 18, 20243:23-cv-03195California3,668 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ELAINE BROWN, Case No. 23-cv-03195-AMO

8 Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

9 v. DISMISS

10 CITY NATIONAL BANK, Re: Dkt. No. 9 Defendant. 11

12 13 This is a mortgage discrimination case. Before the Court is Defendant City National 14 Bank’s (“CNB”) motion to dismiss. The matter is fully briefed and suitable for decision without 15 oral argument. See Civil L.R. 7-6. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their 16 arguments and the relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to dismiss for 17 the following reasons. 18 I. BACKGROUND 19 On July 23, 2018, Plaintiff Elaine Brown opened an account with City National Bank. 20 ECF 1 (“Compl.”) ¶ 28.1 On June 10, 2019, Brown sought a $335,000 home loan from CNB to 21 purchase a condominium in Emeryville, California. Id. ¶¶ 4, 31-32. The following day, CNB 22 provided her with loan rates for the condominium and Brown provided CNB with the requested 23 documents. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.