Serafin

1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 ROBERT SERAFIN, Case No. 23-cv-03275-PCP

8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO

STRIKE, DENYING MOTIONS FOR

9 v. DEFAULT JUDGMENT, AND

ORDERING RESPONSE WITHIN 14

10 REALMARK HOLDINGS, LLC, et al., DAYS

Defendants. 11

12 Before the Court is Ms. Serafin’s motion to strike several paragraphs and exhibits to the 13 Complaint. Defendant Ms. Serafin was served on November 13, 2023. See Dkt. No. 38. On 14 December 4, 2023, she filed the present motion seeking to strike paragraphs 22–36, 39, and 41 and 15 Exhibits C, D, E, F, G, and N to the Complaint. Dkt. No. 39. On December 18, 2023, Mr. Serafin 16 filed redacted versions of exhibits C, D, F, G, and N, Dkt. No. 40, and an opposition to Ms. 17 Serafin’s motion to strike, Dkt. No. 41. Ms. Serafin filed a reply in support of her motion on 18 December 22, 2023. For the following reasons, the Court denies Ms. Serafin’s motion to strike, 19 but finds that the original versions of Exhibits C, D, F, G, and N to the Complaint violate Federal…